Over 59197
politifake

Court Politics


Obama To The SCOTUS??? -




Supreme Court Tyranny -




Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Democrat -




WHAT SUPREME COURT? - The Obama suspends working with Arizona because he doesn't like the Supreme Courts decision? Is that even legal?




GET THEE BEHIND ME, SATAN! - On second thought......


TAGS: supreme court g** marriage doma
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

OlderThanDirt - April 3, 2013, 10:28 am
Ick.
PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 8:38 pm
:-D


How conservatives in America see women -


TAGS: supreme court birth control misogyny
Rating: 2.87/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - July 3, 2014, 6:11 pm
I'm kind of hungry for lunch, but my employer doesn't buy my lunch for me. Which means I'm going to starve.


The Kangaroo Court trial of George Zimmerman! -




ELENA KAGAN - Never ruled on a court case. Never sat behind a bench. Not even a judge. Yet, the White House calls her "supremely qualified" for the highest court in the land. Makes sense. The POTUS had no experience either.




CITIZENS UNITED - Because money is free speech and our Politicians weren't corrupt enough.




IT CAME UPON A MIDNIGHT CLEAR -




GAY ANIMALS - Clearly "natural law" does not apply here.


TAGS: g** marriage supreme court equality
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - April 3, 2013, 12:11 am
Aw, I was just tryin' to troll you, man, nothin' personal.
deerbag2 - April 3, 2013, 12:03 am
Come on admit it, you laughed.
Cannabal - April 2, 2013, 11:57 pm
No, that would be Your Mom there, buddy.
deerbag2 - April 2, 2013, 11:42 pm
Is the one on top named Michelle?
PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 8:32 pm
Clearly they must be atheist socialist lions that were born in Kenya! :-D


vlad speaks -




IF THE MEDICARE ACT IS STRUCK DOWN,WILL PRESIDENT OBAMA DEFY THE COURT’S RULING? - In 1832 the Supreme Court declared the Indian Removal Act unconstitutional. President Andrew Jackson defied it, stating, “John Marshall has made his decision; let him enforce it now if he can.”




DID YOU KNOW THERE ARE 10 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES? - The new one is the one on the upper right




U.S. SUPREME COURT - Undoing hundreds of years of Constitutional Law in favor of corporate interests




RACIAL PROFILING - It has taught us never to judge a book by its cover, unless that cover is hispanic and makes you look open minded.




George Zimmerman murder trial Judge Debra Nelson, of the 18th Judicial Circuit Court in Seminole County, Florida... -




REMEMBER EMINENT DOMAIN - get ready for eminent Obamacare




HIGHEST COURT IN THE LAND - Apex, Acme, Utmost




GUN TOTING MASS MURDERERS -




UNELECTED? - Not just for the Supreme Court anymore.




LIBERAL SUPREME COURT - enjoy the crime wave California




THE ADDAMS FAMILY - Is now represented in the Supreme Court




LAND OF THE FREE - Provided we have your permission, of course.




DNA -




JOKE - What do you call a bunch of lawyers jumping off of a cliff? A good start to a better world.




OBAMACARE PRAYER VIGIL - It's not like it's the first time liberals went to their knees for Obama.


TAGS: obamacare prayer vigil supreme court
Rating: 3.55/5

More politifakes by GrouchoMarxist

romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 10:08 pm
If you keep talking to yourself like that, people might think you're crazy. You're trying to teabag yourself now? Did the bamster dump you? Ouch. LOL..
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 10:02 pm
No prob... Just as long as you continue to not mind being teabagged... I'm cool.. Need a tissue?
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:57 pm
You want help wiping BamBam's, uh, essence from your face? Do it yourself, teabagger. X-D Maybe should've thought twice before becoming a teabagger, kinda messy job. LOL
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 9:49 pm
You need a tissue?
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:44 pm
I know. You get on your knees for them. That's why you and BamBam get along so well! X-D Now, enough debate, get back on your knees for the President. BamBam doesn't like it when you keep him waiting.
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:43 pm
TRANSLATION(Groucho): You hurt my feelings. Now if you excuse me,can't argue right now. I got to get me some new kneepads. I got four years of Obama to prepare for and bambam doesnt like it unless I'm on my knees for him promptly!
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 9:41 pm
Sorry lib boy... We don't bow down to empty suits much less any politician.
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 9:39 pm
You're no different than any empty headed lib...
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:39 pm
And you get four more years to do that! Grouch**EABAGGERmarxist:"I'm gonna need bigger kneepads." LOL
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:38 pm
That we don't judge you for getting on your knees for Obama? That's the nice thing about us libs. We are open minded by that sort of thing. X-D
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 9:35 pm
Keep proving my point
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 9:35 pm
s/s
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:15 pm
P.S. Wanted to thank you for Obamacare. Happy to know that your tax dollars get to pay for my healthcare. Thanx for that, tatatatatateabagger! ;-) At least you can get a doctor to look at those bruises on your knees. hahaaha Mittens' won't pay for it.;-p
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 9:10 pm
Oh, you don't have to get on your knees for me. Won't Mittens get jealous? haha.. Sorry, tatatatatat-teabagger. But you gugugugugguessed wrong. PWN Obamacare passed the court didn't it? HAAHAHA
GrouchoMarxist - October 1, 2012, 8:43 pm
Just fine... You prove it every day on your knees for babababa bam bam ... More Tea?
romneyisatool - October 1, 2012, 3:10 pm
Hmmmm.... let's see. How did 'this prediction' work out for you, Teabagger? LOL..


MEDAL OF HONOR - The courts are absolutely Nucking Futs!. If its ok for a politician to lie about military service/decoration, I guess anything goes now!




DC V HELLER -




I 'DEEM THE' HEALTH CARE -




It's time to tax the churches -




HOW IS THAT FOR "DIVERSITY"? - There are now 6 Roman Catholics & 3 Jews and NO Protestants on the Court.




LIBERAL SUPREME COURT - so far they haven't released one murdered victim




FLOOD - In case you were wondering where all those rabid comments have been coming from.




THANK REPUBLICANS FOR ABORTION - Today’s Republicans Try To Hide This




The art of stupidity -


TAGS: supreme court birth control misogyny
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - July 3, 2014, 6:13 pm
"Get your politics out of my bedroom!" "Not a problem. I'm just going to grab my wallet before I leave." "The wallet stays, bigot." -- Sean Davis
terroraustralis - July 2, 2014, 6:55 am
conservative tea party - f***heads trying to own a part of american history and use it for their own gain. liberal tea party - exactly the same as the conservative one, nothing but scumbag a**holes bastardising history.
terroraustralis - July 2, 2014, 6:52 am
i happen to find it funny that with both political parties waging a war on practically everyone, every single group seems to think they are the only victims.
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 1:58 am
Conservative TEA Party - Theological Emptyheaded A$sholes. A liberal TEA Party - a bunch of hippies lacing their tea with LCD, tripping too hard to give a flying f***. X-D
OTC - July 2, 2014, 1:48 am
Conservative TEA Party - Taxed Enough Already. Liberal TEA Party- Tax Every American
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 11:33 pm
Nah, no such thing, OTC.. X-D The liberals have a jacka$s as their mascot, remember? The neocons are wearing the tea bags. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_kXnVoQ9ZFkQ/St01y21wEkI/AAAAAAAAI-Q/Nb94s9Iyp2Q/s400/teabag+for+jesus.jpg
OTC - July 1, 2014, 11:30 pm
You're wrong skippy, liberals ARE the founders of the Teabag Party. Conservatives founded the TEA Party
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:21 pm
As I said before, I realize that you are damaged goods, but doesn't mean that everyone is out to get you. Try asking your psych for paxil and see if you get any clarity of thought fom it. Don't be upset, I'm only trying to help your bruised ego.
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 9:08 pm
Surrrrrrre.I'll try to remember that conspiracy boy.In the meanwhile, dont be surprised to learn that the world that takes place in your head,exists only IN your head.Just remember:look at the flowers,Emmy,look at the flowers.And everything will be OK :-)
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 9:01 pm
Let's see...1-2-3-4-5 posts? Pushed a b***on did? lol
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 8:51 pm
so, before you type anything, you might want to check with a grown up to see if what you want to say makes any sense to anyone other than you.
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 8:51 pm
Not too bright, are you? I didn't say anything about the teaparty, I did comment about the liberal war on women. You do know that the teaparty is not a liberal organization or do you?
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 7:28 pm
If you think "liberals" are the founders of the American Teabag party, then you really are a special kind of stupid. Take a deep breath, next time, and "think" before you type(or "read" at least).Because if sarcasm is an art form,then you are Uwe Boll X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 6:55 pm
I happen to agree that the liberal war on women is horrible.


Justice -


TAGS: justice law government constitution court
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - July 18, 2013, 11:44 am
D'amn, you're such a bleeding heart.
foxrecon19d - July 17, 2013, 8:58 pm
Unless, of course, George Zimmerman was hung by the neck until he was dead by the blind arbitrary wrath of the state...


PRO-LIFE - There came a point when it was no longer enough to get you on the Supreme Court.




Thomas Sowell -




Make America Kind Again -


TAGS: trump travel ban courts muslim
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by WitchDoctor

WitchDoctor - February 13, 2017, 10:59 am
LOL! Of course Trump and his Salvation army of bullies are the exception to the rule.No one cares when a bully is bullied,because the rest of the world calls that:justice.Speaking of "punches",I have orange-flavored punch in a meme coming right up.CYL Dwy
Dwydwyyr - February 13, 2017, 10:45 am
Great meme, Doctor. They want to build a giant wall, you keep holding up that giant mirror. If the RA'PEpubliKKKlans need their bullying fix, we can make an exception. "When dealing with a bully,you punch back,but harder."~ Trump. Keep obliging that bully
ScatXXVII - February 12, 2017, 7:35 pm
Uses a meme made by a child to accuse Republicans of using memes made by a child. #TrumpWins much, Democrats?
Zeul - February 12, 2017, 9:07 am
^^^ note 3 upvotes ... Nuff Said ... OWNED !!!
F102DeltaDagger - February 8, 2017, 7:39 pm
Amazing, isn't it? The old, white man that created this meme, now is the poster child of ,"now you know why Donald Trump ownes you"
WitchDoctor - February 7, 2017, 10:13 pm
There is NO Berkeley, ONLY Zeul.
Zeul - February 7, 2017, 8:49 pm
So True ... We would all be best setting the example those fine folks at Berkeley set


ObamaCare -




Flashback To 1992: Biden Says Bush Should "Not Name A Nominee Until After The November Election" -




The Dumbing Down of America -




Obama's Buffoonery -




Trump's Weapons Grade Stupidity -




Detestable Display Of Liberal Intolerance & Abhorrence -




SCOTUS care -




democrit -




LULZ -




Trump's weak -




The Gorsuch Club -




Republicans in Congress -


TAGS: mitch mcconnell supreme court scalia
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 28, 2016, 5:54 pm
lol
calron - February 26, 2016, 2:43 am
I actually did mention that it didn't seem that you meant what you literally said with the "should" line, but you kinda ignored that and plowed ahead as if I didn't. P.S. I was raised by wolves so my English is a bit off. :P
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:08 am
root c a n a l
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:08 am
As for the rest, I a**ume you FINALLY got my 'humble' opinion on this. You don't have to take the root ca*** approach every time with my opinion, if you are truly curious. You could always just ask next time? Cheers
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:06 am
In other words, I'm fine with comments on the fly. I trust you and others to get the meaning of it. Not hard.
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:05 am
If English is a 2nd language to me, what is your excuse, Mr.Wrait full! Sry, couldn't resist X-D Seriously, though...it's a comment board. Read between the lines and the gist of it. You're clever kid. Sure you could figure out what I meant.
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:29 am
And as the constitution provide that president get to "nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate" so they have a clear authority for to consent and act like little children and throwing tantrums for not getting their way.
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:24 am
Should: used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions. Misuse of the word would explain a lot. As you have done so frequently, it makes me wonder is English is a second language to you?
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:49 am
And if the GOP continues with the high horse nonsense, the truth is that the constitution is a lil'more on the side of the President to fill this vacancy than that of the GOP to obstruct it. It's a losing argument from sore losers. My 2 cents.
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:47 am
However,I'm making fun of the whining and the phony claims of constitutional this-and-that from the GOP. Their high horse isn't higher than Obama's.Both sides should simply concede that their political interests are at impasse and may the best man win,etc
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:44 am
Again, I don't blame them for obstructing possible Obama's nominee. The dems would/should do the same if facing the same dilemma.And you'd be lying if you told me that the GOP wouldn't sing a different tune if roles were reversed "as they should"
calron - February 24, 2016, 2:17 am
You didn't address what they should do, you addressed what the constitution says and got it wrong. They are allowed to both advise and consent which the the authority they are allowed to use to be unethical hypocritical obstructionists. "as they should"
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 12:47 am
There is nothing in the Constitution that says they can't take a crap on the floor while doing a hand stand. Doesn't mean they should.
calron - February 23, 2016, 2:29 am
Funny as they are constitutionally allowed to just not vote on an nominee.


"The Framers would've framed it this way!" -




Bullsh*tting. -


TAGS: grassley supreme court scalia obamacare
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 15, 2016, 1:41 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/02/04/us/senate-97-to-0-confirms-kennedy-to-high-court.html
fauxnews - February 15, 2016, 1:32 pm
And he was "confirmed" during, wait for it...AN ELECTION YEAR 1988 X-D Not appointed/confirmed a year before *cough* -ahem liar
fauxnews - February 15, 2016, 1:21 pm
On November 30, 1987, Kennedy was nominated
Olympusmanager - February 15, 2016, 1:16 pm
Kennedy was appointed the year before so this meme is totally misleading and false. in other words, a lie.
Bandit5906 - February 15, 2016, 11:02 am
In 1960 the Dems passed a resolution preventing a appointment of a justice during a presidential election year.


Bernie Sanders’ SCOTUS Pledge Proves He Failed Civics Class -




Extrajudicial Oligarchy -




Your move, Republiklans -


TAGS: supreme court obamacare merrick garland
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - March 21, 2016, 10:11 pm
Given that you believe in a make believe god with zero evidence, you can keep the label of simpleton.That laughter is what I'd expect from a looney fundie, the laughter of insanity.As for the rest, this Nov,we will see who is right,mate.Chip,chip,cheerio
fauxnews - March 21, 2016, 10:07 pm
As for the this idiotic line "a message to democrats that if they win the presidency it will not be business as usual" Soooo..if the other side wins, threats? The losing party doesn't dictate the outcome, democracy does.lol
fauxnews - March 21, 2016, 10:04 pm
3 levels? Republiklan's BS+Your BS+Murican BS= a triple decker sh*t sandwich. Thats's about right.
ipaprime - March 21, 2016, 9:42 pm
So please keep up your simple minded belief that republicans are simple minded and you are a genius. I need the laughs. Cheers.
ipaprime - March 21, 2016, 9:40 pm
3rd; to their constituents, if you want to keep the court balanced as it was keep us in the majority.
ipaprime - March 21, 2016, 9:38 pm
Wrong. This action has at least 3 levels it is working on. 1st; just what we see. 2nd; a message to democrats that if they win the presidency it will not be business as usual.
fauxnews - March 21, 2016, 10:05 am
Complex for simple minds, perhaps. For the rest of us, it's politics as usual. Not all that difficult to figure out if you can take a step back from your own. Cheers
ipaprime - March 21, 2016, 1:17 am
On the last point you are incorrect. I would be sitting back and considering the reasons behind the action. Which you haven't done. This play is far more complex than you seem to think it is. I eagerly await your "WHAT?"
fauxnews - March 20, 2016, 11:53 am
P.S. Politically, if this situation was reversed,I doubt you'd be making the same arguments. Say that the lib Ginsburg died the final year of W.Bush's Presidency,you'd be screaming for his'right'to replace her.And I'd agree with you on that point.Cheers
fauxnews - March 20, 2016, 11:51 am
So, the implication couldn't be clearer - the 'current' President aka.present timeline.“shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate". The intent is for them to work things out.The Repubs have already balked at any compromise(2/2)
fauxnews - March 20, 2016, 11:48 am
The Constitution does not say that presidents 'may' nominate justices. It says they "shall" do so. The Constitution does NOT say that presidents are limited in this duty "by the timing" when a vacancy occurs.(1/2)
ipaprime - March 20, 2016, 10:24 am
Constitution puts no timeline in place.
fauxnews - March 20, 2016, 12:40 am
The Constitution intends for a timely process. Not this crybaby feet-dragging tantruming. No one's buying their high horse spin. And as it stands, they're risking an even more liberal nomination if Hillary wins. They are playing this poorly.
ipaprime - March 19, 2016, 11:58 pm
Republican majority in the senate means the people have spoken. Read the constitution.


Your move, Republiklans -


TAGS: supreme court obamacare merrick garland
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - March 20, 2016, 12:36 am
My problem isn't that the Repubs shouldn't defend their self-interests in this.It's that they are playing this poorly,which is why Obama is handing them their arse on this issue.They are making fools out of themselves.My 2 cents(2/2)
fauxnews - March 20, 2016, 12:34 am
Sooo...the Republi****s should say as much rather than this whiny [email protected] nonsense about letting the nxt President decide via the will of the people. They were BOTH chosen to figure this out in the present.Obama's come halfway with a reasonable pick.(1/2)
ipaprime - March 19, 2016, 11:56 pm
The president nominates to fill the vacancy. Senate says yes or no to nominee per the CONSTITUTION. And the American people elected the republicans to a majority in 2014. Your move democraps.


Supreme Hypocrisy -




The Unwise Latina -




Obama and the Supreme Court -




Liberals -




Conservative Majority Supreme Court rules in favor of Gay Marriage -




Republican Logic -


TAGS: bruno g** marriage supreme court
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 6, 2015, 6:35 pm

OK guys, Let's drop this for now. MMess, no one accused you of anything here, you are mixing up 2 different issues.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 4:36 pm
It was to show how low you dead tree trolls will stoop to get your way and to let you people know how easy it is to disprove false allegations
mittromney - July 6, 2015, 2:47 pm
,so you are just being self-conscious/sounds like you know how the system works inside and out,which means you’d also know the loop holes-like a hacker would.Hmmm,that doesn’t sound suspicious.guilty much?do everyone a favor - learn some online etiquette/
mittromney - July 6, 2015, 2:46 pm
/why are you filing this kind of complaint in public when that’s what the report function and pm utility is for?To put on a show,of course.Like the rest of us wanna f**ing see your dirty laundry.I dont see anyone here publicly accusing you of "false PMs”,
mittromney - July 6, 2015, 2:44 pm
/wtf?! holy online bar brawl Batman!/some say train wrecks are still fascinating to watch.also thought that's the world's biggest load of crap,gather the man who coined the phrase never actually saw a train wreck in person before.nothin'fascinating there/
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 2:09 pm
You too :)
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 2:06 pm
P.S. I noticed you hadn't gotten to my PMs. Hence, all this; in my attempt to get a hold of you. Disregard 'em, basically says the same thing already said here in triplicate....Glad you're sticking around, mate.Have a good one Rebecca :-)
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 2:02 pm
For a moment there, I almost grabbed a smoke, and I haven't smoked for years. So how could I ever tease you for it? It's all good. I'm a happy girl now. A community of good loyal friends FTMFW ... Cheers, Faux :)
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 1:59 pm
That's a relief. Who else could I count on to keep me honest as I continue to quit smoking ;-) Seriously...glad you're gonna stay part of our Politifake family, dysfunctional as it it. We need our Denmother, tigeress,etc. Cheers, mate :-)
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 1:55 pm
...or as Starlord might say,clusterf**k,of too much at once.Inadvertent of not,all cards are out on the table.Should make for a more peaceful place,which is all I care about.Dont worry-I plan to stick around,feet planted.Thanks for the kind words,Faux :D
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 1:51 pm
You had me at Groot. :) Seriously tho - Don't worry doll, the others changed my mind too. The out-flowing of support was very touching.Here and in private. In my defense, cliche as it sounds, I was a little PMS'y. Just a bad confluence...
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 1:45 pm
Can others,especially those others that used to gun for us,say the same? Of course not.That means something!In other words,you must be doing SOMETHING right.Hold onto that during tough times.Besides,Zeit even changed his avatar to Groot for you X-D (2/2)
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 1:41 pm
Come on Rebecca, don't leave us. Moo's a good guy, and you know it, he's just doing his job (he's hands are just tied). The occasional derpery can make anyone a little crazy here. What matters we're still here, long and strong,after all this time(1/2)
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 9:51 am
The PHPBB logs are stored in the MySQL database and are accessible via the Control Panel.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 9:44 am
false PMs. You can narrow it down by using the dates and times on the fake PMs that were sent to you.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 9:43 am
Mooooooo, I would suggest that you ask the owners of the site to go to the PHPBB logs and search them for any PM that I have sent to anyone on this site. You will find there was only 2 sent - both to you. After that, you can ban the perpetrators of the
Zeitguy - July 5, 2015, 7:24 pm
Glad y'all worked things out Starlord and Sir.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:55 pm
[#77780] haha. No worries, Moo. Again, crossposting. it was how I was raised - I was a military brat. Weirds me out too when I hear myself say that, blame it on pathological bu.ttkissing of authority drilled into me by a strict father. ^_^ Have a good one
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:52 pm
[#77778] And thank you for the clarification, sir. And to be clear, I meant no disrespect for your authority. Nor was I trying to go over your head. Truthfully, deep down inside I always trust you know what you are doing. Thank you for moderating the site
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:52 pm

I've been on this network for over 6 years, I'm used to it. Just please stop calling me "sir". It weirds me out.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:48 pm
[#77772 ,#77774,] Yeah, cross posting is a real b*tch. It's like we are debating over a temporal time continuum like different versions of the Terminator. ^_^ I didn't know about the banned member,and the cross posting further changes the meaning of posts
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:48 pm

I get what you're trying to say and to be clear I wasn't trying to upset Rebecca.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:45 pm
If you are able to sort out the cross posting, you will see my intentions are noble.Thank you for your ear. Take it easy Moo+17o's sir. ^_^
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:43 pm
I respect you too much Moo, sir, and Rebecca to not step in. You both make good points. I just everyone to get along. I respect you both too much to be dishonest with you. It's a colossal misunderstanding turning into a cluster f*ck
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:42 pm
-you weren't aware of MMess false accusations of meat/sockpuppetting with his repeated tag-team troll attacks, that certainly changes everything.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:41 pm

Think about this... I have actually banned a member for retaliating against another member who I had just banned hours earlier for the initial attack. REPORT your problems, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:41 pm
4. As far as Rebecca, or the rest of us go, most of us have thick skins. It's not that - I don't consider the word "crap" rude. It's the way the whole situation was handled with a lack of empathy toward all the facts of the case. But if you are saying-
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:39 pm

no problem, we're typing all over each other.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:39 pm
#77769 was in response to #77765. We were cross posting, so ignore the lag, it will change the meaning.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:38 pm

If you guys bothered to report problems or PM them to me your issues with certain members would be settled a lot faster, instead most of you attack or break rules and end up getting yourselves in trouble.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:36 pm
My apologies. I didn't realize you wrote this when I typed #77766 and #77767. I hate the comment boards the way they work, lag and all. I will PM you the links to MMess's "dead tree troll" sock/meatpuppet false accusations. Disregard my other comments
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:35 pm

compared to the way all of you talk to each other using the word "crap" is hardly rude, and this is not even close to the firs time I've had to ask Rebecca to stop.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:34 pm
-if MMess is truly a newbie, then he at least has an agenda as demonstrated with this fixation on FN. Admonishing a veteran member but being silent with a newbie would embarrass anyone into possible exile.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:33 pm
3. How is Rebecca supposed to be feel comfortable sticking around when you rudely admonish her in a public setting while being silent when MMess is on the rampage. I wouldn't want to stick around either-
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:33 pm

PM me links to this "dead tree troll" evidence and I'll review it. (you guys realize I'm a volunteer and cannot possibly read EVERY comment, right?)
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:31 pm
2.An accusation of meatpuppeting is accusing multiple members of working behind-the-scenes to use multiple accounts to harass a known member. Yet no one has publicly admonished MMess for making those false accusations of which he has no proof beyond doubt
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:30 pm

In regards to "handling this privately". I've done that to death, to no avail. In regards to us "knowing" that there are sock poppets...If we could PROVE it they'd be banned. Our hands are tied unless you'd like us to start banning people without evidence
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:28 pm
1. With all due respect, Moo sir [sounds funny when I say it like that], EMMess has made repeated false accusations of meat-puppetting with his repeated tag team dead tree troll attack, which is in the same class of sockpuppeting accusations
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:24 pm

That being said, no one is asking Rebecca to leave, if she does that is her own choice.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:23 pm

..... to PM it to one of the moderation team.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:23 pm

I have had this same debate time and time again with both sides on this site and it never seems to sink in, DO NOT accuse other members of socking in comments or the forum. If you have Proof (not just belief) that someone is a sock puppet feel free...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:20 pm

We have been very clear about the accusations of sock puppeting. If one of you can prove those accusations to me without a doubt we will take action, but you cannot. The same rules apply to both sides.
Zeitguy - July 5, 2015, 5:54 pm
Are kidding me? I thought this was forum that allowed for truthful debate without spineless moderator intervention. Now we lose a thoughtful contributor because she correctly called out a known troll.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:54 pm
finally, typo3 *#77752"It is SORELY [not solely] needed at these forums." :::and I don't have a good excuse, I'm hungover from a clam bake the night before and can't spell worth sH*t today:::
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:49 pm
also, typo2 *#77753 "Wild spirits, like some wild horses, are not meant to BE broken."
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:21 pm
now for my typos heh *#77749 "A person would be lying if they DIDN'T acknowledge it."
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:16 pm
Bye Rebeccaolsen. Wild spirits, like some horses, are not meant to broken. Happy trails tigress. ^_^
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:14 pm
Take care Rebecca. You and your valuable POV, no matter how out there, will be missed - it is solely needed at these forums which are often time overwhelmed by a virulent conservative POV that bullies away the liberal members. Good luck in your endeavors.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:13 pm
-that's at least a serious violation of this forum, and you can hardly blame those provoked by his agenda and trolling strategy. Okay, now I will get off my soapbox.^_^
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:11 pm
-then MMessEnnBeeCee has easily failed that. At least he is as deserving of public admonishment as well. I do not agree that Rebecca or anyone should be the strawman or, even worse, the scapegoat. EMma likes to provoke others into an "emotional response"-
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:09 pm
-other veteran members have acknowledged it here and elsewhere. A person would be lying if they'd acknowledge it.If it's true the admins know of previous banned trolls returning to this forum but allow it "as long as they comport to the best of behavior"-
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:07 pm
I acknowledge I may get into trouble speaking my mind as well, but the situation is all the more threatening when, ironic as it is, EMma clearly is THAT "Emma" everyone loathes and suffers now and again. He/she doesn't try to hide it-
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:05 pm
MMessEnnBeeCee has at least has been as guilty as any one here of disruptive behavior deserving of a public admonishment, which would be embarrassing for anyone. With all due respect, it represents a double standard which robs an environment of fairness
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:01 pm
With all due respect,to the powers that be,I respectfully disagree with publicly admonishing BEcca for calling MmEssEnBeCee "EMma".Not to mention the tone was rude.I expect grown up behavior from our mods.It could not have been handled privately with her?
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 2:56 pm
That's a shame BEcca. :( Wish there's something I could say to make you stay but I gather you are sworn to your conviction.Can hardly blame you though,considering what you've been through.Sent you my email and Fb link in a private message - stay in touch
OTC - July 5, 2015, 2:56 pm
Doesn't matter who he might be, you should address him as who he is. I doubt liberals are still addressing Catilyn as Bruce
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:45 pm
typo: same people = same "person" (sorry, texting one handed here. Bye everyone! It was fun. Will send some of you my email in a PM so we can keep in touch.Take care Politifakers. Happy trails) :D
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:36 pm
Everyone should check and compare the posts of those trolls I listed and then you tell me in good conscience they are not the same people. Sorry you all have to suffer that sociopath. Not my problem anymore. Bye all :)
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:35 pm
And for everyone else new to this drama, Moo has a thing for a vicious troll named Arnnatz who he thinks was unfairly banned despite his completely inappropriately behavior. Since then Arnnatz has been back as another user named StoneTools and Emmaroydes
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:32 pm
Or you can ban me because your ego comes first even though I dare to be honest about something on everyone's mind, that harms us all. Either way this is my last post. Bye Politifake.
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:30 pm
How about I do you one better and I leave, Moo. You and I both know MMessEnnBeeCee is EmmaRoydes. But once again you selfishly plan to make the entire forum suffer for the sake of your need to enable that troll. I can't tell you to stop the enabling crap.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 2:18 pm

Stop with the EMMa crap.
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 11:50 am
Awww, is that what you think? Adorable :) If "wishful thinking" (read: projecting) helps you cope with the public shame of being a coward after you blew it, then I'm glad I could help. Does that mean you're now finished with your month-long tantrum EMMa?
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 5, 2015, 9:55 am
You are right, never go to a link I post since, like last time, it will blow your argument out of the water. It's cowardly to act that way, but completely expected of you.
rebeccaolsen - July 4, 2015, 5:52 pm
Funny you mention that doll.Where I am at,they do this lovely Lexington beer flight of red,white and blue ale.I leave fireworks & demolitions duty to my significant other,I just spring for the ear plugs.Off 2 enjoy some festivities. Take care, Starlord :)
guest818 - July 4, 2015, 5:44 pm
pwned ... 5Ls on the comeback. Good memories are a radical Republican's worst enemy. Just ask Jeb Bush ^_^ ... btw, Happy 4th Becca! drink plenty of Red, White and Blue ale, if they make such a thing. And blow up lots of stuff - fireworks rock! Take care
rebeccaolsen - July 4, 2015, 5:31 pm
ts;dr :D *I don't click your links. Many of us long ago made an agreement not to, remember? How is that campaign to ignore me working out for you?* noodlespines FTL
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 4, 2015, 2:56 pm
http://variety.com/2015/biz/news/republican-role-marriage-equality-1201531880/


Antonin Scalia -


TAGS: antonin scalia supreme court justice g** marriage dissent
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:19 pm
Nope. He actually DID say that - [email protected] pg.6- "Not a single South Westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California doesn't count.)" http://documents.latimes.com/supreme-court-rules-g**-marriage/#document/p74/a224855
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:12 pm
While the overall sentiment has some legal merit, I rather doubt he said "California does not count"; I'm also pretty sure he knows how to spell "partisan".


On Gay Marriage, Cue GOP crybaby whining -


TAGS: g** marriage boehner supreme court
Rating: 3.97/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:13 pm
Well...not according to the conservative majority Supreme court. And - not according to their Constitution. So, No, it is not about redefining marriage - "They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The 'Constitution' grants them that right."
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:27 pm
But they already had the same rights. Survival benefits, shared ownership, tax breaks, etc. through Domestic Partnerships and Civil Unions. This was never really about "equal rights", it was about redefining marriage. Whatever.


Kids react to gay marriage ruling -


TAGS: kids g** marriage supreme court
Rating: 3.92/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - July 4, 2015, 4:30 pm
So is that your excuse, kiddo? :-D Thank you for the clarification
Cyberhagen - July 4, 2015, 1:29 pm
Kids say anything their parents have raised them to say, and that's true of either ideology, right or left.


An easy Republican Button to push -


TAGS: g** marriage supreme court
Rating: 3.83/5

More politifakes by guest818

rebeccaolsen - July 2, 2015, 12:08 am
There is no tabloid or opinion pieces cited in this politifake,which was clearly meant as a joke. In fact, you are the only one who EVER tries to pass off that junk as proof of your "arguments." So you're making fun of yourself,good one. Echolaliafail FTL
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 11:49 pm
looks like when you pu.sh his bu.ttons, out comes the tabloids like clockwork - opinion pieces that mean as much in the way of evidence as my mailman's views on animal control. #sourcefails


T r i f e c t a ! -




Hey, Republicans... -


TAGS: g** marriage obamacare supreme court
Rating: 3.79/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Dwydwyyr - September 4, 2015, 10:25 am
This needs to be updated, to say "rough year." lol ... You still on vacation, FN? You are missing out on all the fun! As long as Trump is running for Prez, this is the Golden Age of Conservatardism. Won't get better than this.
Zeitguy - June 27, 2015, 9:12 pm
That pic makes me giggle.


A Supreme Court decision is the law of the land -


TAGS: supreme court texas attorney general g** marriage
Rating: 3.66/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 4:24 pm
lol
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:23 pm
Anytime ^_^ To be honest, you are a little bit out there - so I don't agree with everything you say,FN. But on this,you are on point ...Plus,nothing is more amusing than watching you push EMma's bu.ttons - seems like all you have to do is show up. Cheers
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 4:19 pm
Thank you for the shout out, Guest :-)(#77581) Cheers
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 4:13 pm
Sry,but I still DGAF.So what if you're embarrassed you blew it?How's that my prob?You'll never get me 2 agree with you,or join you in your dishonesty.Whining to me isnt gonna change anything...Let us know when you actually decide to"move along" Cheers :-)
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:59 pm
In the meanwhile, you might want to get some aloe for your nostrils. They must be burning ^.^ Too bad they don't have aloe for your burning temper - those b***.ons are red ho.t today
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:53 pm
of course citizens have the democratic right to protest laws.But whiners like Wallace or Paxton dont have the right to defy law,they were hired to administer the laws of the land.So they need to GTFO.You're too busy projecting to see the point of the meme
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:51 pm
[#77578] The poster is right on the $$$ actually. Again, the poster isn't arguing that the constitution doesn't change. Nor is it arguing that citizen shouldn't protest law. It is ridiculing govt officials like Governor Wallace and Ken Paxton.
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:48 pm
i noticed that as well, apparently so have the others.
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:47 pm
this pi.ssed you off so badly that you vomited coffee thru your nose? So much for saying it didn't push your bu.ttons^.^... You go around lecturing others as if you are in a position of authority,when really you are just a troll with a persecution complex
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 3:35 pm
I blew nothing. Your poster is pure BS. Especially the STFU comment.As I stated, if people did that, the Volstead Act or Prohibition, it would still be the "Law of the Land".
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 3:34 pm
I just blew coffee thru my nose after reading your comment. Pretending to be a mod? Where in the hell did that crap come from?
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 2:33 pm
ain't no thang :)
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 2:28 pm
Thank you for being generous with your toys, Rebecca, and sharing EMma with the rest of us ^_^
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 1:32 pm
Cheers :)
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 1:31 pm
Thank you for the kind words, Becca. I must be doing SOMETHING right,mate; I haven't gotten a cigarette joke from you lately. ;-) Cheers
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 1:29 pm
Great poster Faux. 5 "ferocious"(lol) Lions. :-D Well ya kinda nailed that one!
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 1:26 pm
Yea! Our lolcow is back! :-D And here I was worrying for nothing that I had broken our favorite 'toy-MMess-doll' the last time we played. Silly me :)
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:51 pm
That's clearly the point of the poster, and mine.No one here's arguing ga.y marriage wont be overturned one day or that the constitution doesnt change over time.That's your warped reading because you're too busy projecting.Your bu.ttons do that to ya ^_^
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:47 pm
of course the average voter has the democratic right to protest laws.But whiners like George Wallace or Ken Paxton dont have the right to defy law, they were hired to administer the laws of the land.So they need to GTFO and get a different job or STFU
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:39 pm
yeah, yeah, yeah - this is pushing your bu.ttons and you are too insecure to be honest about it. Got the memo, thanks.I don't care about any of that.THE POINT I DO CARE ABOUT - this poster is referring to government officials, not the average citizen
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 12:35 pm
Well, thank ya Zeit and Guest. Thawnk yuz vury mutch. *in my best worst Elvis voice* ;-) Cheers
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:30 pm
I second that, Zeit! ^_^ 5Ls on your comments Fauxnews.[#77561,#77562,#77563] That was a work of art, FN - PWNing as poetry. Magnificent.
Zeitguy - July 1, 2015, 12:18 pm
I love when Trolls get called out!
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 12:14 pm
because I have enough sense not to debate a fool trolling me.However,your history of pointing out“other’s ignorance"(on the other hand)has only backfired on you historically.So go for it.Knock yourself out-ironically,you do so anyways LITERALLY X-D Cheers
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 12:02 pm
(#77560)And,again,nothin'you're saying(or have said)will change the facts that(A)you"blew it"and(B)that I plan to remain a member here :-D Not my prob if those 2facts push your bu.ttons.You're barking up the wrong"dead"tree X-D My roots are firmly planted
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 11:58 am
(#77559) correction: you have 'the freedom' to BS and be dishonest.only you would see that as "a right", mostly because you lack the integrity and moral authority to see past your own "ignorance." no one buys your pretending-to-be-a-mod "routine." X-D
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:37 am
and I understand perfectly well why you are afraid to debate me and it's not that it gets h**, it's that you can't do it without losing your cool or using the name calling routine you are so well know for.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:23 am
Fauxnews: I did move on until I saw this ignorant poster. I reserve the right to point out ignorance where I see it.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:20 am
If the citizens had just STFU, those two laws I cited would still be the "Law of the Land". Unjust laws and SCOTUS rulings need to be protested by citizens to get them fixed.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:19 am
Looks like you completely missed my point. Look at the wording in the poster, now look at how previous rulings were "Laws of the Land" and were overturned later. Now add the fauxnews statement "kindly STFU" Says a lot that I had to explain that to you.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:17 am
I'm not worked up any more than anyone else on this site. The fact that you can't see that speaks volumes.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:16 am
nah, sounds like fauxnews had his but.tons pushed. Try reading comments before coming to conclusions.
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:35 am
when you get all worked up like that over constitutional law, your reasoning becomes [dare I say] so emotional it is pretty darn ga.y. Or to quote you, "Oooooo." Ga.y indeed. Fitting ^_^
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:26 am
By citing examples of how present Supreme court rulings take precedent over the past,you're only making his point for him -ie.at present,ga.y marriage is the law of your land.Glad to see you accept it,albeit unintentionally.Take a deep breath next time EM
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:22 am
Hmm.Sounds like your b.uttons were pushed again,EM ^.^ You're so angry over this that you can't see things straight - i.e.the Supreme ct. since 1850 and 1920 has overruled BOTH examples.Until that happens with g** marriage,it remains your law of the land.
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 1:48 am
Nothing good ever comes from our exchanges other than disruption of this forum. So, for the sake of peace on the site: pretty please 'with sugar on top', grow a spine and actually stick to your own words for a change and "MOVE ON."(#77120) Cheers.
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 1:43 am
I thought you said you were "moving on."(#77120)Your exact words,were "As you requested, i'm moving on." So why don't you be a good little troll and follow your own advice.Im not debating somebody whose obviously been aggressively trying to antagonize me.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 12:17 am
Or the 18th amendment (prohibition) and the fact that SCOTUS upheld it in 1920. I wonder if people were telling everyone "It's the law of the land. Now kindly STFU"?
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 30, 2015, 11:53 pm
You might want to read the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and SCOTUS opinions approving of it.


Sweet Jesus -


TAGS: g** marriage jesus supreme court
Rating: 3.53/5

More politifakes by guest818

guest818 - July 8, 2015, 5:08 pm
5) A simple internet search reveals ancient aliens exist, proof for the Lochness monster, fans of Paris Hilton, and the illuminati. It's not proof of anything other than how your sociopathic logic gets the better of you in these "debates." *Amen*
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:40 pm
4) Thank you for proving my point. ^_^
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:39 pm
3) Even with that debunked, this poster wasn't about the rest of the bible. It's about Jesus. Rome had a lot of g.ay activity for its time. Jesus was very thorough in his teachers. If he had prob with it, he would've said something on it.
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:38 pm
2) Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis does not explicitly identify ho.mo***uality as the sin of that hedonistic morality tale, it's concerned with the violent r.ape of guests and slaves.
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:36 pm
1) BS. 6:9 20:13 Refer to the holiness Code, a code of purity meant to distinguish the behavior of Israelites from the Canaanites. It's a very warped and contemporary reading of those passages from many a translated text to get to that political meaning.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 8, 2015, 4:17 pm
I don't know the bible or the teachings of Jesus, but a simple internet search reveals that the bible does address homo***uality in at least the following verses: 1 Corinthians 6:9 Leviticus 20:13 Jude 1:7 IDK if Jesus had said anything about it
Zeitguy - July 8, 2015, 2:10 pm
Amen


The US Supreme court -




Self-Explanatory -




Antonin Scalia -




PREV PAGE